The Removal Process

We understand that the legal process and choosing an attorney can be overwhelming. It is the task of attorney Yale Martin Fishman to make this process as comfortable as possible for you.

Yale Martin Fishman is founder and associate attorney in the law office of Yale Fishman Associates and practices in the areas of family law and immigration. He started the firm after receiving her Juris Doctorate. Yale Fishman Attorney has several years of immigration and legal experience that he is eager to use to serve his NYC community.

In this article, Fishman puts his own take on the removal processes and some of the types of proceedings an immigration judge may preside over.

In a removal process, a person must appear for hearings before an immigration judge determines if the person can stay in the United States. Removal procedures begin when the government determines that a person does not have a valid immigration status or that a person has done something that threatens the valid immigration status.

Removal procedures begin when an immigration officer files with an immigration court a document called a “Notice to Appear,” which includes the allegations against a particular person.

The government must verify the allegations used to argue the expulsion. If the person subpoenaed to court does not attend the hearing, the immigration judge will most likely grant the government's request to expel the person in question.

Removal processes begin with an initial hearing known as a “master calendar hearing.” (A person may have multiple master calendar hearings.) At the master calendar hearing, the defendant who faces the removal process must accept or deny the charges imposed by the government against him or her. The defendant will also have the opportunity to identify options such as asylum, adjustment of status, or cancellation of removal to avoid deportation.

The next hearing known as the “merit hearing,” is generally scheduled during the “master calendar hearing.” The master calendar hearing is generally very short, but the defendant may submit additional information to the motion or application that he filed during the master calendar hearing up to fifteen days before the merits hearing.

The merits hearing is a long and complex hearing where an immigration judge listens to the defendant's testimony and reviews the evidence, documentation presented, and legal arguments to make a decision about motions or applications filed with the court.

The dedication and persistence of attorney Yale Martin Fishman allows him to fight for his clients to achieve the best possible results. As a successful immigration and family law practitioner, Fishman expanded his practice to include bankruptcies and criminal cases. Experienced attorney Yale Martin Fishman founded the firm allowing for a broader range of services. Yale Fishman Attorney also understands that each client's situation is different and offers different services and payment plans.

Story behind whistleblowers in the US, by Yale Fishman Associates

Fighting corruption and similar forms of crime is an extremely difficult challenge for the institutions aimed at its eradication. Officials from Yale Fishman Associates say that there are some difficult ways and methods these perpetrators use, that even when found, another challenge is to prove their existence. Hence, came the great importance of whistleblowers in this fight. Perhaps, the information that these people can offer to the investigation nobody else possesses, and may be critical to the discovery and proof of a crime.

In short, Fishman Associates defines these people as "persons who report or disclose information about a threat or violation to/of the public interest in the context of their employment, regardless of the public or private sector."

Previous cases in which Yale Fishman was present have failed to prove illegal activities due to fear, and even before a new law to protect whistleblowers was adopted, the situation was even worse. So, for several years the state has committed to protect the whistleblowers in the fight against corruption, thereby receiving considerable support from the citizens.

ESPP for Economic Operators

ESPP can implement the following procedures for public contracts: a procedure for auction, whether it is an open procedure or a restricted procedure. When carrying out the procedure for a public contract via the EPPS, Fishman Associates advise all procedures (publication of a contract notice and auction documents, submission of auctions, public evaluation, decision making, information on decisions, communication with economic operators) to be implemented electronically. At the same time, everybody can conduct an electronic auction through the ESPP. Yale Fishman Associates then says that a competitive dialogue procedure and the negotiated procedure with prior publication of a contract notice might be worked out and in case of competition by economic operators a framework agreement can be created.

The system is implemented along with improvements and innovations regarding: mandatory publication of a notice and auction for supplies above $50.000 dollars; implementation of the module of negative references of bidders or economic operators that have low quality and perform badly in timely manners or public contracts; module for publishing the technical dialogue - when contracts are the object of purchase with an estimated value exceeding $130,000 dollars for goods and services; introduction of a qualification system for specific manner working with public contracts in the sector contracting and publication of advertisements for concessions and public-private partnerships.